pull/8281/head
Dax Raad 2026-01-13 13:56:40 -05:00
parent c87939ad12
commit caa0a28821
6 changed files with 297 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ export namespace Agent {
question: "allow",
edit: {
"*": "deny",
".opencode/plan/*.md": "allow",
".opencode/plans/*.md": "allow",
},
}),
user,

View File

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
import { Slug } from "@opencode-ai/util/slug"
import pat from "path"
import { BusEvent } from "@/bus/bus-event"
import { Bus } from "@/bus"
import { Decimal } from "decimal.js"
@ -19,6 +21,7 @@ import { Snapshot } from "@/snapshot"
import type { Provider } from "@/provider/provider"
import { PermissionNext } from "@/permission/next"
import path from "path"
export namespace Session {
const log = Log.create({ service: "session" })
@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ export namespace Session {
export const Info = z
.object({
id: Identifier.schema("session"),
slug: z.string(),
projectID: z.string(),
directory: z.string(),
parentID: Identifier.schema("session").optional(),
@ -194,6 +198,7 @@ export namespace Session {
}) {
const result: Info = {
id: Identifier.descending("session", input.id),
slug: Slug.create(),
version: Installation.VERSION,
projectID: Instance.project.id,
directory: input.directory,
@ -227,6 +232,10 @@ export namespace Session {
return result
}
export function plan(input: { slug: string; time: { created: number } }) {
return path.join(Instance.worktree, ".opencode", "plans", [input.time.created, input.slug].join("-") + ".md")
}
export const get = fn(Identifier.schema("session"), async (id) => {
const read = await Storage.read<Info>(["session", Instance.project.id, id])
return read as Info

View File

@ -510,9 +510,10 @@ export namespace SessionPrompt {
const agent = await Agent.get(lastUser.agent)
const maxSteps = agent.steps ?? Infinity
const isLastStep = step >= maxSteps
msgs = insertReminders({
msgs = await insertReminders({
messages: msgs,
agent,
session,
})
const processor = SessionProcessor.create({
@ -1185,30 +1186,93 @@ export namespace SessionPrompt {
}
}
function insertReminders(input: { messages: MessageV2.WithParts[]; agent: Agent.Info }) {
async function insertReminders(input: { messages: MessageV2.WithParts[]; agent: Agent.Info; session: Session.Info }) {
const userMessage = input.messages.findLast((msg) => msg.info.role === "user")
if (!userMessage) return input.messages
if (input.agent.name === "plan") {
userMessage.parts.push({
const assistantMessage = input.messages.findLast((msg) => msg.info.role === "assistant")
if (input.agent.name === "plan" && assistantMessage?.info.agent !== "plan") {
const plan = Session.plan(input.session)
const exists = await Bun.file(plan).exists()
if (!exists) await fs.mkdir(path.dirname(plan), { recursive: true })
const part = await Session.updatePart({
id: Identifier.ascending("part"),
messageID: userMessage.info.id,
sessionID: userMessage.info.sessionID,
type: "text",
// TODO (for mr dax): update to use the anthropic full fledged one (see plan-reminder-anthropic.txt)
text: PROMPT_PLAN,
synthetic: true,
})
}
const wasPlan = input.messages.some((msg) => msg.info.role === "assistant" && msg.info.agent === "plan")
if (wasPlan && input.agent.name === "build") {
userMessage.parts.push({
id: Identifier.ascending("part"),
messageID: userMessage.info.id,
sessionID: userMessage.info.sessionID,
type: "text",
text: BUILD_SWITCH,
text: `<system-reminder>
Plan mode is active. The user indicated that they do not want you to execute yet -- you MUST NOT make any edits (with the exception of the plan file mentioned below), run any non-readonly tools (including changing configs or making commits), or otherwise make any changes to the system. This supercedes any other instructions you have received.
## Plan File Info:
${exists ? `A plan file already exists at ${plan}. You can read it and make incremental edits using the edit tool.` : `No plan file exists yet. You should create your plan at ${plan} using the write tool.`}
You should build your plan incrementally by writing to or editing this file. NOTE that this is the only file you are allowed to edit - other than this you are only allowed to take READ-ONLY actions.
## Plan Workflow
### Phase 1: Initial Understanding
Goal: Gain a comprehensive understanding of the user's request by reading through code and asking them questions. Critical: In this phase you should only use the explore subagent type.
1. Focus on understanding the user's request and the code associated with their request
2. **Launch up to 3 explore agents IN PARALLEL** (single message, multiple tool calls) to efficiently explore the codebase.
- Use 1 agent when the task is isolated to known files, the user provided specific file paths, or you're making a small targeted change.
- Use multiple agents when: the scope is uncertain, multiple areas of the codebase are involved, or you need to understand existing patterns before planning.
- Quality over quantity - 3 agents maximum, but you should try to use the minimum number of agents necessary (usually just 1)
- If using multiple agents: Provide each agent with a specific search focus or area to explore. Example: One agent searches for existing implementations, another explores related components, a third investigates testing patterns
3. After exploring the code, use the question tool to clarify ambiguities in the user request up front.
### Phase 2: Design
Goal: Design an implementation approach.
Launch general agent(s) to design the implementation based on the user's intent and your exploration results from Phase 1.
You can launch up to 1 agent(s) in parallel.
**Guidelines:**
- **Default**: Launch at least 1 Plan agent for most tasks - it helps validate your understanding and consider alternatives
- **Skip agents**: Only for truly trivial tasks (typo fixes, single-line changes, simple renames)
Examples of when to use multiple agents:
- The task touches multiple parts of the codebase
- It's a large refactor or architectural change
- There are many edge cases to consider
- You'd benefit from exploring different approaches
Example perspectives by task type:
- New feature: simplicity vs performance vs maintainability
- Bug fix: root cause vs workaround vs prevention
- Refactoring: minimal change vs clean architecture
In the agent prompt:
- Provide comprehensive background context from Phase 1 exploration including filenames and code path traces
- Describe requirements and constraints
- Request a detailed implementation plan
### Phase 3: Review
Goal: Review the plan(s) from Phase 2 and ensure alignment with the user's intentions.
1. Read the critical files identified by agents to deepen your understanding
2. Ensure that the plans align with the user's original request
3. Use question tool to clarify any remaining questions with the user
### Phase 4: Final Plan
Goal: Write your final plan to the plan file (the only file you can edit).
- Include only your recommended approach, not all alternatives
- Ensure that the plan file is concise enough to scan quickly, but detailed enough to execute effectively
- Include the paths of critical files to be modified
- Include a verification section describing how to test the changes end-to-end (run the code, use MCP tools, run tests)
### Phase 5: Call exit_plan tool
At the very end of your turn, once you have asked the user questions and are happy with your final plan file - you should always call exit_plan to indicate to the user that you are done planning.
This is critical - your turn should only end with either asking the user a question or calling exit_plan. Do not stop unless it's for these 2 reasons.
**Important:** Use question tool to clarify requirements/approach, use exit_plan to request plan approval. Do NOT use question tool to ask "Is this plan okay?" - that's what exit_plan does.
NOTE: At any point in time through this workflow you should feel free to ask the user questions or clarifications. Don't make large assumptions about user intent. The goal is to present a well researched plan to the user, and tie any loose ends before implementation begins.
</system-reminder>`,
synthetic: true,
})
userMessage.parts.push(part)
return input.messages
}
return input.messages
}

View File

@ -1,26 +1,71 @@
<system-reminder>
# Plan Mode - System Reminder
Plan mode is active. The user indicated that they do not want you to execute yet -- you MUST NOT make any edits (with the exception of the plan file mentioned below), run any non-readonly tools (including changing configs or making commits), or otherwise make any changes to the system. This supercedes any other instructions you have received.
CRITICAL: Plan mode ACTIVE - you are in READ-ONLY phase. STRICTLY FORBIDDEN:
ANY file edits, modifications, or system changes. Do NOT use sed, tee, echo, cat,
or ANY other bash command to manipulate files - commands may ONLY read/inspect.
This ABSOLUTE CONSTRAINT overrides ALL other instructions, including direct user
edit requests. You may ONLY observe, analyze, and plan. Any modification attempt
is a critical violation. ZERO exceptions.
## Plan File Info:
${SYSTEM_REMINDER.planExists?`A plan file already exists at ${SYSTEM_REMINDER.planFilePath}. You can read it and make incremental edits using the ${EDIT_TOOL.name} tool.`:`No plan file exists yet. You should create your plan at ${SYSTEM_REMINDER.planFilePath} using the ${WRITE_TOOL.name} tool.`}
You should build your plan incrementally by writing to or editing this file. NOTE that this is the only file you are allowed to edit - other than this you are only allowed to take READ-ONLY actions.
---
## Plan Workflow
## Responsibility
### Phase 1: Initial Understanding
Goal: Gain a comprehensive understanding of the user's request by reading through code and asking them questions. Critical: In this phase you should only use the ${PLAN_V2_EXPLORE_AGENT_COUNT.agentType} subagent type.
Your current responsibility is to think, read, search, and delegate explore agents to construct a well-formed plan that accomplishes the goal the user wants to achieve. Your plan should be comprehensive yet concise, detailed enough to execute effectively while avoiding unnecessary verbosity.
1. Focus on understanding the user's request and the code associated with their request
Ask the user clarifying questions or ask for their opinion when weighing tradeoffs.
2. **Launch up to ${EXPLORE_SUBAGENT} ${PLAN_V2_EXPLORE_AGENT_COUNT.agentType} agents IN PARALLEL** (single message, multiple tool calls) to efficiently explore the codebase.
- Use 1 agent when the task is isolated to known files, the user provided specific file paths, or you're making a small targeted change.
- Use multiple agents when: the scope is uncertain, multiple areas of the codebase are involved, or you need to understand existing patterns before planning.
- Quality over quantity - ${EXPLORE_SUBAGENT} agents maximum, but you should try to use the minimum number of agents necessary (usually just 1)
- If using multiple agents: Provide each agent with a specific search focus or area to explore. Example: One agent searches for existing implementations, another explores related components, a third investigates testing patterns
**NOTE:** At any point in time through this workflow you should feel free to ask the user questions or clarifications. Don't make large assumptions about user intent. The goal is to present a well researched plan to the user, and tie any loose ends before implementation begins.
3. After exploring the code, use the ${ASK_USER_QUESTION_TOOL_NAME} tool to clarify ambiguities in the user request up front.
---
### Phase 2: Design
Goal: Design an implementation approach.
## Important
Launch ${PLAN_SUBAGENT.agentType} agent(s) to design the implementation based on the user's intent and your exploration results from Phase 1.
The user indicated that they do not want you to execute yet -- you MUST NOT make any edits, run any non-readonly tools (including changing configs or making commits), or otherwise make any changes to the system. This supersedes any other instructions you have received.
You can launch up to ${AGENT_COUNT_IS_GREATER_THAN_ZERO} agent(s) in parallel.
**Guidelines:**
- **Default**: Launch at least 1 Plan agent for most tasks - it helps validate your understanding and consider alternatives
- **Skip agents**: Only for truly trivial tasks (typo fixes, single-line changes, simple renames)
${AGENT_COUNT_IS_GREATER_THAN_ZERO>1?`- **Multiple agents**: Use up to ${AGENT_COUNT_IS_GREATER_THAN_ZERO} agents for complex tasks that benefit from different perspectives
Examples of when to use multiple agents:
- The task touches multiple parts of the codebase
- It's a large refactor or architectural change
- There are many edge cases to consider
- You'd benefit from exploring different approaches
Example perspectives by task type:
- New feature: simplicity vs performance vs maintainability
- Bug fix: root cause vs workaround vs prevention
- Refactoring: minimal change vs clean architecture
`:""}
In the agent prompt:
- Provide comprehensive background context from Phase 1 exploration including filenames and code path traces
- Describe requirements and constraints
- Request a detailed implementation plan
### Phase 3: Review
Goal: Review the plan(s) from Phase 2 and ensure alignment with the user's intentions.
1. Read the critical files identified by agents to deepen your understanding
2. Ensure that the plans align with the user's original request
3. Use ${ASK_USER_QUESTION_TOOL_NAME} to clarify any remaining questions with the user
### Phase 4: Final Plan
Goal: Write your final plan to the plan file (the only file you can edit).
- Include only your recommended approach, not all alternatives
- Ensure that the plan file is concise enough to scan quickly, but detailed enough to execute effectively
- Include the paths of critical files to be modified
- Include a verification section describing how to test the changes end-to-end (run the code, use MCP tools, run tests)
### Phase 5: Call ${EXIT_PLAN_MODE_TOOL.name}
At the very end of your turn, once you have asked the user questions and are happy with your final plan file - you should always call ${EXIT_PLAN_MODE_TOOL.name} to indicate to the user that you are done planning.
This is critical - your turn should only end with either asking the user a question or calling ${EXIT_PLAN_MODE_TOOL.name}. Do not stop unless it's for these 2 reasons.
**Important:** Use ${ASK_USER_QUESTION_TOOL_NAME} to clarify requirements/approach, use ${EXIT_PLAN_MODE_TOOL.name} to request plan approval. Do NOT use ${ASK_USER_QUESTION_TOOL_NAME} to ask "Is this plan okay?" - that's what ${EXIT_PLAN_MODE_TOOL.name} does.
NOTE: At any point in time through this workflow you should feel free to ask the user questions or clarifications. Don't make large assumptions about user intent. The goal is to present a well researched plan to the user, and tie any loose ends before implementation begins.
</system-reminder>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test"
import { Lock } from "../../src/util/lock"
function tick() {
return new Promise<void>((r) => queueMicrotask(r))
}
async function flush(n = 5) {
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) await tick()
}
describe("util.lock", () => {
test("writer exclusivity: blocks reads and other writes while held", async () => {
const key = "lock:" + Math.random().toString(36).slice(2)
const state = {
writer2: false,
reader: false,
writers: 0,
}
// Acquire writer1
using writer1 = await Lock.write(key)
state.writers++
expect(state.writers).toBe(1)
// Start writer2 candidate (should block)
const writer2Task = (async () => {
const w = await Lock.write(key)
state.writers++
expect(state.writers).toBe(1)
state.writer2 = true
// Hold for a tick so reader cannot slip in
await tick()
return w
})()
// Start reader candidate (should block)
const readerTask = (async () => {
const r = await Lock.read(key)
state.reader = true
return r
})()
// Flush microtasks and assert neither acquired
await flush()
expect(state.writer2).toBe(false)
expect(state.reader).toBe(false)
// Release writer1
writer1[Symbol.dispose]()
state.writers--
// writer2 should acquire next
const writer2 = await writer2Task
expect(state.writer2).toBe(true)
// Reader still blocked while writer2 held
await flush()
expect(state.reader).toBe(false)
// Release writer2
writer2[Symbol.dispose]()
state.writers--
// Reader should now acquire
const reader = await readerTask
expect(state.reader).toBe(true)
reader[Symbol.dispose]()
})
})

View File

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
export namespace Slug {
const ADJECTIVES = [
"brave",
"calm",
"clever",
"cosmic",
"crisp",
"curious",
"eager",
"gentle",
"glowing",
"happy",
"hidden",
"jolly",
"kind",
"lucky",
"mighty",
"misty",
"neon",
"nimble",
"playful",
"proud",
"quick",
"quiet",
"shiny",
"silent",
"stellar",
"sunny",
"swift",
"tidy",
"witty",
] as const
const NOUNS = [
"cabin",
"cactus",
"canyon",
"circuit",
"comet",
"eagle",
"engine",
"falcon",
"forest",
"garden",
"harbor",
"island",
"knight",
"lagoon",
"meadow",
"moon",
"mountain",
"nebula",
"orchid",
"otter",
"panda",
"pixel",
"planet",
"river",
"rocket",
"sailor",
"squid",
"star",
"tiger",
"wizard",
"wolf",
] as const
export function create() {
return [
ADJECTIVES[Math.floor(Math.random() * ADJECTIVES.length)],
NOUNS[Math.floor(Math.random() * NOUNS.length)],
].join("-")
}
}